In my case, it happens intermmittently and never during playback. I have read about HDMI handshake issue on the internet and all of the complaints seem to relate to constant flickering. The strange thing is that the issue happens only when the Blu-ray player ejects the disc but not during playback.
Samsungtv picture suddenly flickery and cloudy tv#
I am having the same problem with my Sony Ubpx800 Blu-ray player and LG OLED 55cp7 TV (using Aveton brand 4K HDMI Cable 6 ft, rated 5 star by over 500 customers on Amazon, feels like a very well constructed HDMI cable). While digital signals can endure a lot of waveform degradation before there is data loss, when the data loss comes it comes on fast. Now, the retort at this point is often, "digital is digital and if it gets through it gets through." Yes, I would respond, but there is an "if" in there. Little variations in wire or dielectric dimensions can cause tremendous problems. This is why, when you look at something like high-speed data cable, or microwave coax, or anything like that which is supposed to carry extreme high bitrates or RF frequencies, manufacturing tolerances are so important. The reason paperclips would do poorly would not be resistance-it would be that a bunch of paperclips would have very, very poor return loss characteristics due to uncontrolled characteristic impedance. If it were all about wire gage, it'd be very easy to make very-long-distance HDMI cable: all we'd need to do would be to build little adapter boxes to allow us to go up to whatever AWG we need for the distance. What Chris is pointing out here is that transmission line issues, not wire gage, are going to determine whether signal gets through. The parties were actually in complete agreement all along. Then, someone realized that the problem was that in Britain, to "table" something means to put something up for discussion, while in America, to "table" something means to put it on hold and stop discussing it. This evidently went on for a while, with both parties becoming increasingly frustrated at the other. The British responded that it was precisely BECAUSE the matter was so important that it must be tabled. The Americans objected, saying that the matter was important and must not be tabled. There was a topic which the American and British staffs both felt was urgent and required immediate review and decision, and the British proposed to "table" it. This argument reminds me of an incident during WWII. Chris is arguing with what you said, not with what you actually meant. You meant, perhaps, to say "omnidirectional" or "bi-directional" or something like that. You said that cables are "uni-directional." I think what you meant was that they are not directional at all, but "uni-directional" means that they work in one direction only. srobak: I think that your argument with Chris is a simple confusion over a word-I think you two are completely agreed on the underlying subject.
0 kommentar(er)
